Apr 26, 2017 by
a text entry box
For this reflection, please read the following:
- Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate L. Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3913-3922. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184
- Loïc Caroux, Charles Consel, Lucile Dupuy, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2014. Verification of daily activities of older adults: a simple, non-intrusive, low-cost approach. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (ASSETS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661360
In your reflection, address the following topics in 400-600 words (total, word count not including the questions you write for class):
These two papers are quite different from one another, but are still both focused on older adults. Because of that, I want you to discuss each paper separately. For each paper:
- Discuss three strengths of the work - please write in paragraph form
- Discuss three weaknesses of the work - please write in paragraph form
Please remember to write 3-5 discussion questions for class.
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.